Gig Work Tax

Which states offer the PTE tax election?

State-Specificintermediate3 answers · 6 min readUpdated February 28, 2026

Quick Answer

Currently 29 states plus DC offer PTE tax elections, including major markets like California (9.3% rate), New York (10.3%), and Texas (0.75% margin tax). Each state has different rules - some require minimum income thresholds, others have mandatory vs. optional elections, and rates range from 0.75% to 13.3%.

Best Answer

PS

Priya Sharma, Small Business Tax Analyst

Professional service providers operating across multiple states who need to understand varying PTE rules

Top Answer

States with PTE elections as of 2026


As of 2026, 29 states plus Washington DC have implemented pass-through entity tax elections, though the specific rules, rates, and requirements vary significantly. Understanding these differences is crucial for multi-state consultants and businesses operating across state lines.


Major states and their PTE programs


California (9.3% rate): Optional election for entities with income over $1 million. Refundable credit for owners. Election due by March 15th of the tax year.


New York (10.3% rate): Optional election with no minimum income threshold. Refundable credit. Allows estimated payments throughout the year.


New Jersey (10.75% rate): Optional election with $10,000 minimum payment requirement. Refundable credit for residents, nonrefundable for nonresidents.


Texas (0.75% margin tax): Uses existing franchise tax structure rather than creating new PTE tax. Lower rate but different calculation method.


Illinois (4.95% rate): Optional election with no restrictions. One of the most straightforward implementations.


Complete list of PTE states by region



Key differences between state programs


Mandatory vs. Optional: Most states make the election optional, but a few have mandatory PTE taxes for certain entity types or income levels.


Minimum thresholds: Some states require minimum income ($1M in CA) or minimum payments ($10K in NJ) to participate.


Credit types: Credits may be refundable (can result in refunds) or non-refundable (limited to tax liability). This significantly affects cash flow.


Nonresident treatment: Rules vary widely for how nonresident owners are treated, affecting multi-state partnerships.


Example: Multi-state consulting firm analysis


Your 3-partner consulting firm has offices in California, New York, and Texas, with $1.2M total income allocated as:

  • California source: $600,000
  • New York source: $400,000
  • Texas source: $200,000

  • PTE election strategy:

  • California: Elect PTE, pay $55,800 (9.3% × $600K)
  • New York: Elect PTE, pay $41,200 (10.3% × $400K)
  • Texas: Consider franchise tax election, pay $1,500 (0.75% × $200K)
  • Total entity-level tax: $98,500
  • Federal deduction saves: $98,500 × 37% = $36,445

  • States without PTE elections (as of 2026)


    Notably absent states include:

  • Florida, Nevada, Tennessee, Washington: No state income tax, so no PTE needed
  • Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas: Have not implemented PTE elections
  • Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota: Still considering legislation
  • Wyoming, South Dakota: No state income tax

  • What you should do


    For multi-state operations, analyze each state separately. The election must typically be made at the entity level and applies to all owners, so one partner in a non-PTE state doesn't prevent the election. Map your income by state, calculate potential savings, and consider compliance complexity. Use our quarterly estimator to model payments across all applicable states.


    Key takeaway: 29 states plus DC offer PTE elections with varying rates (0.75%-13.3%) and rules, requiring state-by-state analysis for multi-state entities to maximize tax savings.

    *Sources: [Multistate Tax Commission PTE Guide](https://www.mtc.gov/), [IRS Notice 2020-75](https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-20-75.pdf)*

    Key Takeaway: 29 states plus DC offer PTE elections with varying rates (0.75%-13.3%) and rules, requiring state-by-state analysis for multi-state entities to maximize tax savings.

    PTE election details by major states

    StatePTE RateMinimum ThresholdCredit TypeElection Deadline
    California9.3%$1M incomeRefundableMarch 15
    New York10.3%NoneRefundableMarch 15
    New Jersey10.75%$10K paymentRefundable (residents)March 15
    Connecticut6.99%NoneNon-refundableMarch 15
    Illinois4.95%NoneRefundableMarch 15
    Texas0.75%Margin tax rulesN/AMay 15

    More Perspectives

    PS

    Priya Sharma, Small Business Tax Analyst

    Solo practitioners who need to understand which states might benefit their specific situation

    High-benefit states for freelancers considering S-corp election


    While most solo freelancers can't directly use PTE elections, understanding which states offer the best programs helps you evaluate whether converting to S-corp structure makes financial sense.


    Top states for potential S-corp + PTE strategy


    California: With the highest state income tax rates (up to 13.3%) and a 9.3% PTE rate, the savings potential is substantial. However, California requires $1M+ in income to elect.


    New York: 10.3% PTE rate with no minimum income threshold makes it accessible for freelancers earning $150K+. New York City adds additional complexity but also potential savings.


    New Jersey: 10.75% PTE rate but requires $10,000 minimum payment, making it viable only for freelancers earning $200K+ annually.


    States to avoid for PTE strategy


    No-tax states: Florida, Nevada, Tennessee, Texas (income tax), Washington, Wyoming have no need for PTE elections due to lack of state income tax.


    Low-rate states: Colorado (4.4%), Illinois (4.95%), and Utah (4.85%) offer minimal federal tax savings that may not justify S-corp compliance costs.


    Calculation for freelancer considering S-corp


    If you're earning $300,000 as a solo consultant in New York:

  • Current state tax: ~$20,000
  • S-corp + PTE election could save: ~$6,400 in federal taxes
  • S-corp compliance costs: ~$3,000 annually
  • Net annual benefit: ~$3,400

  • This becomes more attractive as income increases above $400,000.


    Key takeaway: Solo freelancers should focus on high-tax states with accessible PTE programs (NY, CT, MA) when considering S-corp conversion for PTE eligibility.

    Key Takeaway: Solo freelancers should focus on high-tax states with accessible PTE programs (NY, CT, MA) when considering S-corp conversion for PTE eligibility.

    PS

    Priya Sharma, Small Business Tax Analyst

    W-2 employees with freelance partnerships who may work across state lines

    PTE considerations for remote workers


    As a remote worker with partnership income, your state tax situation can be complex, especially if your W-2 employer is in a different state than your partnership activities or where you physically work.


    Common remote worker scenarios


    Scenario 1: Live in Florida (no state tax), W-2 from New York company, partnership income from California clients.

  • No Florida state tax on any income
  • May owe New York tax on W-2 income (depends on remote work rules)
  • California PTE election available for partnership income
  • Potential savings: California PTE election still beneficial for federal tax purposes

  • Scenario 2: Live in Colorado, W-2 from Texas company, partnership with clients nationwide.

  • Colorado has PTE election (5.5% rate)
  • Texas has no state income tax
  • Partnership income sourcing rules determine Colorado vs. other state taxation
  • Strategy: Elect Colorado PTE if partnership income is Colorado-sourced

  • Multi-state compliance complexity


    Withholding requirements: Some states require PTE tax withholding for nonresident partners, affecting your quarterly payment strategy.


    Apportionment rules: Partnership income may be apportioned across multiple states based on where services are performed, creating complex PTE election decisions.


    Credit limitations: Some states limit PTE credits for nonresidents, reducing the benefit of elections in states where you don't live.


    Strategic state selection


    If you have flexibility in where you establish your partnership (common for remote consulting), consider states with:

  • Strong PTE programs (CA, NY, NJ)
  • Clear nonresident credit rules
  • Favorable apportionment formulas
  • No minimum income thresholds

  • Avoid states with mandatory PTE elections or complex nonresident rules that could create unexpected tax obligations.


    Key takeaway: Remote workers should prioritize states with clear PTE rules and favorable nonresident treatment, as multi-state compliance can quickly become complex and costly.

    Key Takeaway: Remote workers should prioritize states with clear PTE rules and favorable nonresident treatment, as multi-state compliance can quickly become complex and costly.

    Sources

    pte statesstate tax electionspass through entitystate comparison

    Reviewed by Priya Sharma, Small Business Tax Analyst on February 28, 2026

    This content is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional tax advice. Consult a qualified tax professional for advice specific to your situation.